Culture department performance and ridiculous criticism !!
 |
| Cultural & politics |
There are three kinds of people in our society. On the one hand there are people who are doing their job, focusing on improving their character, on the other hand there are people who are doing their part but the other. There are also corrective opinions about man's actions, ie the concept of criticism and reformism, no one has the role to play his part, but if one does not act, refuses to do so, his Obstacles along the way, creates. Putting obstacles and forcing it to create problems. You are already doing your job. There are three kinds of people in our society. If you look at different institutions, forums, departments, etc., you will see many such people. Be surprised Why does it forget that people are identified by their work which also forms their character, this is where people's identity, thinking, action and character begins.
I feel the need to write this because I have been the Minister of Culture, Tourism and Innovation Syed Sardar Shah for a long time and from time to time any statement or statement regarding the department from print and electronic media to social media. Has come to the force.
There is a lot of criticism on the media, which has a lot of criticism on its shoulders, so I thought it would be wise to look at both the performance of the department and the critics and guess what the real issue is, criticism from both sides. While trying to come up with ideas, and to see them flush it out, it's really fun.
First of all he should look at the Minister of Literature on the literary side, there is no denying that, Syed Sardar Shah is a good poet and writer, he is known as a poet, it is a good thing to have a Minister of Tourism and tourism is better. That the Minister belongs to this department, it should be noted that I do not mean to say that the work, role and function of the department cannot be criticized, can be criticized and corrective opinion can be given.
Syed Sardar Shah has organized seminars and conferences on various archeological and historical sites of Sindh in which he has been the Minister for Mines in both past and present. Historians and researchers from all over the world. , Authors participated. Historians, researchers, writers and journalists from across Sindh and Pakistan participated in the preservation of historical heritage and sites and organized a conference or seminar which was held not only in the district but also at historical and archeological sites in different districts of Sindh. has been. The department intends to promote and introduce historical and archeological sites in Sindh as well as launch such programs.
To preserve and preserve the heritage, the department worked on a new train called Literary Fairs, organizing literary fairs in different district headquarters of Sindh, including culture, civilization, literature, politics, sociology, journalism.
And the date on which the meetings or ceremonies were held, the entire ceremony of Syed Sardar Shah as the Chief Minister in both these periods will be written in detail. The topic will be very long, so I will mention them briefly, the department will work on a new train of conferences, seminars, literary events, book publishing, poets, writers, artists in both periods. Fine Arts has been providing financial assistance to the beneficiaries in the name of scholarships and endowment funds, as the department participates in seminars, conferences, fairs, live events and all programs, including writers and poets from Sindh. The number of people who have criticized him for his abilities, and the ones who have been criticized less and less, is a bit vague, given that the department has done it wrong or at the national level.
To give them a better idea or advice, they say that what works also makes mistakes, but there is no major error, ie the work is being done by the department, I have written above, it should be repeated. That the performance and role of the minister may be criticized, but there is an improvement, but we have the performance of the department and the minister.
M, instead of commenting on personalities or talking about character, is being criticized, the criticism is not new or the first time, but the reason is that when Sisi's Minister of State was enacted, the same lawyer and department His arrows were rained down from the side.
Criticism from the Minister, if anyone answers, 'Yes!' Corrective suggestions, advice and comments are better than just criticizing and in return be awarded the title of official writer. Surprisingly, we consider it our democratic and national duty to criticize the performance of departments and departments. But to explain their good deeds. Don't If someone does, why do you consider them a sin and a sin? A few days ago it was reported that the department has given ration checks and stipends to miscreants. But to help someone.
Good and good thing, but what is the attitude that the department is stirring up criticism so that it does not do the same thing again, which includes the English Language Authority case? I see it and read that Sindh is suffering from problems, water, even every national issue is facing federal issue but our skills, women's pen and thinking revolve around the department. With regard to culture, tourism and antiquities, the question is why art and pen do not deviate from the national and federal issues of Sindh. However, now we have our own thinking and thinking, we have to change the attitude from neutral. Neutrality on national issues.
